Other Articles in
Vol. 4 No. 2 / Oct 2018

Editorial: Did Arminius Win? by Paul Wells
On Serving God in Our Generation by DAVID MCKAY
Transgender: Trans-ition to Nowhere by PETER JONES
Sexuality and the Lost Proletariat by NOEL WEEKS
Genesis 2:24 and the New Covenant: A Profound Mystery by COLIN HAMER
Unio cum Christo and Reformed Complementarity by NATALIE BRAND
Lessons from the Reformation for Hermeneutics Today by HENK VAN DEN BELT
The Theology of the Canons of Dort: A Reassessment after Four Hundred Years by ARNOLD HUIJGEN
Election: The Father’s Decision to Adopt by JASON VAN VLIET
Abundant Sufficiency and Intentional Efficacy: Particular Redemption at the Synod of Dort by LEE GATISS
The Documents of the Synod of Dort (1618–1619)—A New Edition by DONALD SINNEMA
The Perennity of Anselm’s Proslogion by YANNICK IMBERT
Pierre Viret: A Pastor and Ethicist for the Twenty-First Century by TIMOTHY BLOEDOW
John Calvin and Philip Melanchthon’s Sum of Theology by PAUL AND ALISON WELLS
Puritans on the Family: Recent Publications by JOEL R. BEEKE AND PAUL M. SMALLEY
Interview with Peter Opitz by PETER A. LILLBACK
Book Review: Robert Sherman. Covenant, Community, and the Spirit: A Trinitarian Theology of the Church by DONALD E. COBB
Book Review: Herman Selderhuis. Martin Luther: A Spiritual Biography by EUNJIN KIM
Book Review: Jonathan Willis. The Reformation of the Decalogue: Religious Identity and the Ten Commandments in England, c. 1485–1625 by HARRISON PERKINS
Book Review: Matthew Barrett. The Grace of Godliness: An Introduction to Doctrine and Piety in the Canons of Dort by JEONG KOO JEON
Book Review: David Gibson and Jonathan Gibson, eds. From Heaven He Came and Sought Her: Definite Atonement in Historical, Biblical, Theological, and Pastoral Perspective by THOMAS HAVILAND-PABST
Book Review: James P. Eglinton, ed. and trans. Herman Bavinck on Preaching and Preachers by SINCLAIR B. FERGUSON

ABUNDANT SUFFICIENCY AND INTENTIONAL EFFICACY: PARTICULAR REDEMPTION AT THE SYNOD OF DORT

by LEE GATISS in Vol. 4 No. 2 / Oct 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.art9



Abstract
This article looks at the background to the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) and examines the debate there on the issue of particular redemption or definite atonement, with a specific focus on the use of the classic distinction between sufficiency and efficacy made famous by Peter Lombard’s Sentences. It also looks at the variety of Reformed responses to the Remonstrants, including those on the death of Christ that might be categorized as hypothetical universalist. It calls into question the usefulness of the terminology of “four-point Calvinists” to describe delegates such as John Davenant.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Back to Article List Download Journal